Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 27, 2021

Created

Tue Aug 04 21:18:51 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@BrendanNyhan @jonmladd I really wish you'd responded in more detail to that article that I wrote 8(!) years ago. It's pretty devastating and pretty detailed, and was the culmination of months' worth of research. Has never really been adequately engaged with by you or other "fundamental"-ists. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@BrendanNyhan @jonmladd The fundamentals models have performed **terribly** out of sample and they're also a **complete mess** this year. I don't think this is adequately recognized by you or other people in the profession. https://t.co/uzhRzj9s2F — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@BrendanNyhan @jonmladd Since you think the Abramowitz model is strong, happy to agree to make it the standard by which we judge these and settle the debate that way. It's prediction for the the electoral vote this year is: Biden 996, Trump -453 I'll take the under on Biden. https://t.co/Nb2HFqaLR3 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 4, 2020 Deleted Hibernated Just a Typo