Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 30, 2020

Created

Mon Jul 20 18:31:25 +0000 2020

Likes

343

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Which one wins out? Well, we're actually trying to quantify that. But a decent prior is probably just that uncertainty should be somewhere around average. What I wouldn't want to do is take stuff from the 1st list that lowers uncertainty in my model *while ignoring the 2nd list*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 20, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

The case for high uncertainty: * Extremely high economic uncertainty * A huge amount of news, mostly around COVID, could create further shocks (yes, this can be quantified to some extent) * Uncertainties around voting mechanics during a pandemic may make polling (& voting) harder — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 20, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

It may be that some pollsters haven't fixed issues (e.g. education weighting) that led them to understate Trump's vote in 2016, but 2016 also created a market for some pretty spammy R-leaning polls with strong house effects. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 20, 2020 Hibernated