Profile Image

Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked Oct. 14, 2020

Created

Wed Apr 29 21:35:27 +0000 2020

Likes

269

Retweets

55

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So... I think al their data is pretty compatible. First of all, one needs to be careful about comparing stocks (total number of people ever infected) and flows (number of people infected at any one time). So let's say the *flow* in Stockholm was 2.5% of people infected as of 4/1. — PolitiTweet.org

Justin Fox @foxjust

These projections that 30% of Stockholmers have already had the coronavirus are so strange. The government did rand… https://t.co/5vUfPN8Ut9

Posted April 29, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

2) However, it also increasingly seems that their numbers are leveling off, especially in Stockholm, which is what you would expect if 30% of the population has had it there (as their ambassador claims) providing some herd immunity. Here is their ICU data: https://t.co/I6cNalVUYL — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 29, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

A month is enough time for that 2.5% of cases to spread 5-6 times over. If cases were turning over with an R of 1.3 (maybe what you'd get with relaxed social distancing) that gradually declines because of increasing herd immunity, you'd wind up with something roughly like this: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 29, 2020 Hibernated