Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 15, 2020

Created

Wed Feb 19 17:46:04 +0000 2020

Likes

574

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Welp this is annoying, but we found an issue with how our model was making state-by-state forecasts. The error is fixed. The topline effect is not very large and mainly helps "no majority" slightly. A few state forecasts have changed more noticeably. 1/ https://t.co/JDz2dZ8bqR — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Obviously Bloomberg could see his #'s keep growing, or they could shrink, but the scenario where he stalls out at ~16%, enough to make Biden's fall much worse and to blunt momentum for Buttigieg, but without coming particularly close to Sanders, is a really good one for Bernie. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Specifically, the demographic regressions we use as a compliment to the polls weren't calculating properly since some code changes we introduced on 2/5 (after IA). As a result, the state forecasts were underdispersed (too conservative) especially in states with little polling. 2/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 19, 2020 Hibernated