Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 18, 2020

Created

Tue Feb 04 23:53:00 +0000 2020

Likes

1,793

Retweets

196

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Another reason the cable TV pundits fixate on Bloomberg's chances is that pundits don't know how to deal with uncertainty and they can just say "Bloomberg!" to sound smart whenever they're dealing with ambiguities instead of admitting they don't know what's going to happen. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

I mean, it's not lucky... it's sort of baked in, in fact. Buttigieg is the sort of candidate you're liable to get if Iowa and New Hampshire vote first. But Warren and Sanders are also pretty good fits for the IA+NH combo, and they benefit from it on balance. — PolitiTweet.org

just massively lucky for biden/warren/sanders that the candidate who won the fresh face lane in IA + NH has not sho… https://t.co/uEhlDlny6N

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Because he's polling at 9% nationally and it's gonna be 40% of the way through the calendar before he can really get any momentum and so the math just don't work to get a majority of delegates even in relatively optimistic scenarios for him. — PolitiTweet.org

@NateSilver538 I have enormous respect for your analysis and would like to read a full account of why you're so dis… https://t.co/I6I9b78IcP

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated