Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 18, 2020

Created

Tue Feb 04 15:06:38 +0000 2020

Likes

2,626

Retweets

277

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

On the one hand that's good for Sanders, because other states don't use this weird process (although NV does) and if he loses IA, it'll probably be for that reason. On the other hand, those #'s aren't a great sign for Sanders's ability to expand his coalition beyond his base. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

One thing that *all* the data seems to agree upon is that Sanders didn't add many voters from the 1st alignment to the 2nd alignment. Meaning, relatively few people who didn't caucus with him initially joined him later on. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Also, I'm not sure why being at 9% nationally (which is where he is in the averages) is supposed to be so impressive when you need 15% to get delegates. — PolitiTweet.org

At this point I am just killing time, but I think the incessant cable analysis that Bloomberg is the big winner rea… https://t.co/ln055MJ9hy

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated