Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 18, 2020

Created

Tue Feb 04 15:06:37 +0000 2020

Likes

5,017

Retweets

884

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

One thing that *all* the data seems to agree upon is that Sanders didn't add many voters from the 1st alignment to the 2nd alignment. Meaning, relatively few people who didn't caucus with him initially joined him later on. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Buttigieg has now released a more detailed statement and is claiming to have won 28% of SDE's based on ~75% of the vote. That compares to Sanders's statement claiming 28.6% of SDE's based on ~40% of the vote. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

On the one hand that's good for Sanders, because other states don't use this weird process (although NV does) and if he loses IA, it'll probably be for that reason. On the other hand, those #'s aren't a great sign for Sanders's ability to expand his coalition beyond his base. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated