Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 18, 2020

Created

Tue Feb 04 14:13:28 +0000 2020

Likes

395

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@mattyglesias Mostly not, or at least not unless you control for a bunch of confounders. In terms of the primary itself, though, it's not great for anyone's electability case. No one seems likely to have gotten more than ~25% of ~170,000 people. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Certainly possible. Also, Iowa has become quite a bit less Democratic on the whole. But if anything this year, it s… https://t.co/6ZQpEc0Gx0 — PolitiTweet.org

Maybe Iowans are fed up with the whole saturation process too - compounded by having two dozen candidates from the… https://t.co/VgAYEbxep9

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

I'd also note that a pretty big shift in the primaries came in late-Sept./early Oct. when party elites started to signal they were highly unhappy with their field, perhaps partly out of fear of Warren winning since she was surging then. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 4, 2020 Hibernated