Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 18, 2020

Created

Mon Feb 03 14:52:06 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

However, we do not try to simulate the final step that Iowa takes, which is to convert the vote after realignment into something called state delegate equivalents. This last step is likely to help candidates who are strong in rural areas and could hurt Warren and possibly Bernie. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 3, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Our model actually tries to simulate the effects of re-alignment; that is, voters having to choose a different candidate if their candidate does not initially get 15%. https://t.co/jIBc6L3Ptz — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 3, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

I plan to be pretty equivocal in my coverage tonight. I think all 3 measures—first alignment, final alignment, and state delegate equivalents (SDEs)—have a decent claim to validity. The rest of the media may emphasize SDEs since that's the traditional way of counting though. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 3, 2020 Hibernated