Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 26, 2020

Created

Tue Nov 26 21:20:20 +0000 2019

Likes

143

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

FWIW, states *without* the national trend adjustment. IA: Buttigieg 21.5—Sanders 18.1—Biden 17.4—Warren 16.3 NH: Sanders 17.2—Warren 17.1—Biden 16.8—Buttigieg 14.4 NV: Biden 27.8—Warren 19.3—Sanders 18.7—Buttigieg 6.8 SC: Biden 37.6—Warren 12.9—Sanders 12.4—Buttigieg 5.0 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 26, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

States (note: **numbers are adjusted for national trends**) IA: Buttigieg 23.7—Sanders 19.0—Biden 17.1—Warren 14.4 NH: Sanders 17.7—Biden 16.6—Warren 15.9—Buttigieg 15.7 NV: Biden 27.0—Sanders 19.9—Warren 16.9—Buttigieg 8.8 SC: Biden 37.1—Sanders 13.3—Warren 10.6—Buttigieg 6.6 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 26, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@willwilkinson @gelliottmorris @mattyglesias You can test what best predicts the next poll or set of polls; I feel pretty strongly that this is the "correct" way to do it, FWIW. For many polling series (e.g. NH primary polls) you can also test what best predicts the result. Generally speaking, these give similar answers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 26, 2019 Hibernated