Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 24, 2020

Created

Fri Nov 22 21:34:43 +0000 2019

Likes

155

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

That's fair. $30m *per week* would be a different order of magnitude. But there are also likely to be significantly diminishing returns. — PolitiTweet.org

Otoh -- maybe. Otoh -- this is just one week. Would $30m a week for two months move the needle? (Spoiler alert: No… https://t.co/7OvagVEcU4

Posted Nov. 22, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Steyer has spent ~$40 million on ads, almost exclusively in the first 4 states, and only gotten to ~3% in the polls there. So spending $30 million spread out over the *entire country* isn't likely to move the needle that much. — PolitiTweet.org

NEW: Bloomberg has reserved more than $30 million TV ads beginning on Monday. A huge show of financial force. Stor… https://t.co/YvJ9rb6dOt

Posted Nov. 22, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@NickRiccardi Steyer is a meaningful precedent. And Clinton's huge advertising advantage over Trump is a fairly meaningful precedent too. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 22, 2019 Hibernated