Profile Image

Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked April 21, 2020

Created

Sat Nov 16 15:02:12 +0000 2019

Likes

655

Retweets

100

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

With current political coalitions, there's no such thing as a great Senate map for Democrats given the (deliberate) bias of the Senate toward rural states. Rather, there are *OK* maps for Democrats (e.g. 2022), terrible ones (e.g. 2018) and various gradients in between. — PolitiTweet.org

Adam Jentleson 🎈🐢💧 @AJentleson

The 2022 Senate map is great for Dems (better than 2020) so we could also see a scenario like Rs saw in 2018 where… https://t.co/PJ9MBWYeCs

Posted Nov. 16, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Here it is in the 2008 D primary, for example, where basically all polling movement is the result of 3 events: 1) Obama's win in Iowa; 2) Clinton's comeback in NH a week later; 3) Obama's big Super Tuesday. https://t.co/kNrI4V2UZJ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 16, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

In 2022, D pickup opportunities would include WI, PA, FL, NC (& possibly AZ and GA depending on the outcome of special elections). Not bad. But those are also all states that voted for Trump! Presidents don't tend to pickup seats in those sorts of states in the midterms. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 16, 2019 Hibernated