Profile Image

Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked April 4, 2020

Created

Sun Oct 20 17:52:24 +0000 2019

Likes

368

Retweets

52

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

What's also weird is the same tech-savvy writers who would happily acknowledge the limitations of digital ads in any other context (i.e. they're only marginally effective despite the ability to target customers, etc.) uncritically assume they're incredibly effective for politics. — PolitiTweet.org

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

It's not baffling at all! It has an incredibly simple explanation, in fact, although one that implicitly undercuts… https://t.co/O2rJTk48Dv

Posted Oct. 20, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Trump won independents by 16 points in Michigan, 11 points in Wisconsin, 7 points in Pennsylvania, 4 points in Florida. Those swing voters were super important! If Clinton splits indies with Trump in those states, she somewhat comfortably wins the Electoral College. — PolitiTweet.org

(((David Shor))) @davidshor

The idea that Trump won by abandoning persuading moderates and firing up his base is empirical statement that’s tot… https://t.co/UWOo0MMFsa

Posted Oct. 20, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

How Facebook affects what news people consume is almost certainly more important to election campaigns, probably by an order of magnitude, than anything having to do with advertising on Facebook. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 20, 2019 Hibernated