Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 19, 2020

Created

Sun Sep 29 15:50:54 +0000 2019

Likes

111

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

With the marginal hand (7♣6♣), you'll lose money if forced to go all-in. But you'll do fine in the context of an actual poker game, especially against hands like K♠J❤️. It has a lot of "playability": you can bluff, plus sometimes you do hit cards to make a flush, straight etc. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Dorky poker analogy for those of you who like that stuff: In poker, there's a big difference between a marginally weak hand (say, 7♣6♣) and a VERY weak hand (7♣2❤️). Likewise, there's a big difference between a somewhat strong hand (K♠J❤️) and a VERY strong hand (K♠K❤️). — PolitiTweet.org

Most of the key facts on Ukraine so far are 1) quite simple 2) are viewed as prima facie bad by voters (i.e. with o… https://t.co/vZap2w5wX9

Posted Sept. 29, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

With the very weak hand (7♣2❤️), by contrast, you're totally hamstrung. You rarely make a real hand, and you tend to be forced to bluff too often in ways that are pretty obvious. And almost every additional decision you have to make with the hand will compound your problems. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 29, 2019 Hibernated