Sriram Krishnan - sriramk.eth

@sriramk ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 22, 2022

Created

Sun Sep 25 18:17:40 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Sriram Krishnan - sriramk.eth @sriramk

3. Establish where you stand on a decision: something I observed from @finkd in reviews is he would always be clear on where he stood - from "I don't care what you do" to "I care but will let you decide" to "I'm CEO, just do what I say" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 25, 2022

Preceded By

Sriram Krishnan - sriramk.eth @sriramk

2. Establish up front what kind of review it is and change the format to match. Is it just an update? Is a decision? Is it a go/no-go for a project? Each requires different preparation/formats. Common negative pattern: update review becomes "should we kill X" decision meeting. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 25, 2022

Followed By

Sriram Krishnan - sriramk.eth @sriramk

All of these are perfectly fine - what confuses teams is not knowing where their CEO/exec stands on a decision. And will default to "Let's just listen to their feedback" when it might have just been a random comment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 25, 2022