Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 85 of 162.
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepRickCrawford: He also remembers what the President told him directly - that he wanted no quid-pro-quo and for Zelensky to do the rig… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @RepMarkMeadows
Critical from Steve Castor, noting Sondland has no notes, no records, and barely any recollection. The "trifecta of… https://t.co/Emy5XYRhPk
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
This is not a contradiction. It is a direct quote from Amb. Sondland's testimony. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: #ICYMI: “Ambassador Sondland did not tell us, and certainly did not tell me, about a connection between the assistance an… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkMeadows: What this "bombshell" hearing is amounting to: - Another witness who never heard anything from the President - Reach… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Critical from Steve Castor, noting Sondland has no notes, no records, and barely any recollection. The "trifecta of unreliability." In fact, the things he DOES remember clearly are exonerating for POTUS (POTUS never ordered political investigations, said he wanted nothing, etc) — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
What this "bombshell" hearing is amounting to: - Another witness who never heard anything from the President - Reached a nefarious conclusion on his own - Is contradicted by witnesses who actually DID get directives from the President — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @jonallendc: “President Trump never told me directly that the aid was conditioned on the investigations.” — Sondland says he came to tha… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: Game over. https://t.co/K2IA65F0hF — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @jennybethm: see @RepMarkMeadows RT below (like @RepAndyBiggsAZ a minute ago) SONDLAND: "I never heard from President Trump that aid wa… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @Olivia_Beavers: Republicans shooting at heart of where they believe Dem argument is vulnerable. Sondland never heard Trump describe a q… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Gordon Sondland was clear: "I've never heard from President Trump that the aid (to Ukraine) was conditioned on the investigations." So what did @realDonaldTrump say when Sondland DID talk to him? Sondland, quoting POTUS: "I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo." https://t.co/ZuaCybXJj1 — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
The most important quote out of this hearing so far: Sondland: "I've never heard from President Trump that the aid was conditioned on the investigations." He reached this conclusion on his own. So, in short, yet another witness who can't testify to the Democrats' accusations. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
On the 7/25 phone call accusations, which started this entire charade: Gordon Sondland: "Now there are people who say they had concerns about the call—but no one shared any concerns about the call with me at the time" — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Lt. General Keith Kellogg, National Security Advisor to the Vice President and 34 year combat veteran, released this letter yesterday. He was on the 7/25 Trump/Zelensky phone call. "I heard nothing wrong or improper on the call. I had and have no concerns." https://t.co/JjEBpDLVFi — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @DevinNunes: Democrats don't want public to know origins of Ukraine probe like they didn't want public to know origins of Russia probe … — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @DavidBrodyCBN: Umm, this seems like the whole ballgame right here? https://t.co/Z67G9CkCou — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
WATCH: @RepMikeTurner asks a few simple questions, and Amb. Volker's answers undermine Democrats entire case. Volker says: - @realDonaldTrump had valid concerns - The President never demanded political investigations - Ukraine never believed there was a political quid pro quo https://t.co/TsPqVT8C7B — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
The Chairman knows it's not working — PolitiTweet.org
Alana Abramson @aabramson
Schiff seems to be getting angry right now. He's remained very calm throughout the hearings (as was expected) but c… https://t.co/LbSJJZ5teL
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Col. Vindman today testified: he interpreted @realDonaldTrump's 7/25 phone call with Zelensky as a "demand." Democrats were incredulous. Tim Morrison, Vindman's superior, testified he believed Vindman was wrong. That it was NOT a demand. https://t.co/lN8ddHz245 — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: No quid pro quo. No bribery. No extortion. No nothing. @HouseDemocrats better convene another focus group ASAP. Their… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Lt. Col. Vindman's importance to the Democrats relies on Vindman's interpretation that the 7/25 Trump/Zelensky call was a "demand." Please watch this from @RepChrisStewart, who lays out why this interpretation is absurd. @realDonaldTrump's call was not a demand at all. https://t.co/rNAivSy4Tm — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepGosar: The impeachment hoax is crumbling right before our eyes. https://t.co/kliVwGYqPe — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @Jim_Jordan: Q: In no way shape or form... did you receive any indication whatsoever that resembled a quid pro quo. Is that correct?” A… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @SteveGuest: #StopTheMadness https://t.co/sOxvWcnavd — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPChairwoman: This. https://t.co/QEJxrTmqBg — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
The Democrats' impeachment case is collapsing on live television, as we speak. Volker and Morrision answering the last questions from @RepMikeTurner clearly and precisely, blowing wide open holes in the bribery argument. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Chairman Schiff is clearly not getting the answers he wants from Volker and Morrison to close this hearing. Both continue to be clear: in his conduct, Volker never saw or took part in anything resembling bribery or extortion--and Morrison saw nothing wrong with the 7/25 call. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
So far today we have Vindman, who never met or spoke to POTUS, testifying of alarming "demands" in the 7/25 call 3 witnesses disagree - His superior (Morrison) saw nothing wrong - Volker said he saw nothing of the sort - Jennifer Williams, on the call, reported no concerns — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @jeremyherb: Morrison says he wishes that Vindman would have gone to him first instead of going to the NSC lawyers — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
GOP Counsel asking Tim Morrison if Col. Vindman should have come to him about concerns with the 7/25 call before going to an attorney. Morrison makes it clear: yes, he should've come to him, and it was not proper procedure that he didn't. This is a problem for Democrats. — PolitiTweet.org
