Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 9, 2019

Created

Wed Nov 20 00:35:07 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

826

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @GOPoversight: No quid pro quo. No bribery. No extortion. No nothing. @HouseDemocrats better convene another focus group ASAP. Their… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 20, 2019 Retweet

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Lt. Col. Vindman's importance to the Democrats relies on Vindman's interpretation that the 7/25 Trump/Zelensky call was a "demand." Please watch this from @RepChrisStewart, who lays out why this interpretation is absurd. @realDonaldTrump's call was not a demand at all. https://t.co/rNAivSy4Tm — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Col. Vindman today testified: he interpreted @realDonaldTrump's 7/25 phone call with Zelensky as a "demand." Democrats were incredulous. Tim Morrison, Vindman's superior, testified he believed Vindman was wrong. That it was NOT a demand. https://t.co/lN8ddHz245 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 20, 2019