Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 244 of 420.
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @axios: Why it matters: The Huawei debate — which may seem abstract to many Americans — has become one of the most urgent foreign policy… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
This is a disaster for the UK-US relationship. — PolitiTweet.org
Axios @axios
The United Kingdom today announced that Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei will build part of the country's 5G… https://t.co/PuoWyReiNG
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
The “rage at @mattgaetz” era sure was short. He’s been invited to Iowa to be a surrogate for POTUS. — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @matt_latimer: Dear @LouDobbs, you forgot to list some other notable @JavelinDC clients: Don Rumsfeld, Tucker, numerous GOP officeholder… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
https://t.co/CyMpOAGE83 — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @mattyglesias: Other Javelin clients include Mike Lee, Ben Sasse, Don Rumsfeld, and Matthew Yglesias so there’s no telling how far this… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @GlennKesslerWP: Anyone who read @AmbJohnBolton's book on his service in the George W. Bush administration, "Surrender is Not an Option,… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @nytmike: EXCLUSIVE: Bolton privately told Barr last year that he had concerns Trump was effectively granting personal favors to the aut… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @ASPI_ICPC: #CyberDigest | Huawei threatens America's closest relationship | @jonathanvswan | https://t.co/32ec87LwGL — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @jackshafer: I love how the first serial rights to the Bolton book have gone to the New York Times. — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @rachaelmbade: .@LindseyGrahamSC suggests he wants the WH to give the Senate the BOLTON manuscript so he can decide if Bolton needs to t… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @kaitlancollins: President Trump says he hasn't seen a copy of Bolton's manuscript. — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @costareports: NEWS: Toomey proposes a ‘one-for-one’ witness deal in Trump impeachment trial after Bolton revelations... add TOOMEY to t… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
Bolton's former chief of staff in the White House, Fred Fleitz, calls on him to withdraw his book: https://t.co/mplC8xokRO — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @BretBaier: Bold tweet by the newest US GOP Senator https://t.co/LhmIPCzCw2 — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
NEW: Statement from Ambassador John Bolton, Simon and Schuster and Javelin Literary: https://t.co/WpYV44bEWQ — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @BarakRavid: Trump and Gantz https://t.co/472Fu0nwbk — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @NatashaBertrand: Mulvaney's lawyer has issued a statement on Bolton's book. h/t @meridithmcgraw https://t.co/bTWlNHb8gX — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
It stretches my imagination to believe the WH counsel wasn't at least briefed on the manuscript. But we don't YET have reporting to confirm it. Nor does anybody else, so far as I can tell. — PolitiTweet.org
Joe Lockhart @joelockhart
@jonathanvswan But what about Cipillone and the legal/political team preparing for trial?
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
Do I believe that most of the senior WH staff were unaware of the manuscript being held in the NSC? Yes. Unequivocally. — PolitiTweet.org
Luke Zaleski @ZaleskiLuke
@jonathanvswan @shaneharris and you believe them?
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @NatashaBertrand: “Just hours after news of the manuscript broke on Sunday evening, Bolton’s book was available for pre-order on Amazon.… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
Several senior White House officials have told Axios they are pissed that the New York Times learned about the Bolton manuscript before they did. https://t.co/ztYKi7E1hM — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @Phil_Mattingly: Collins reiterates she is likely to vote in favor of considering subpoenas for witnesses and docs, noting Bolton revela… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
Indeed. It’s a very carefully worded statement from the NSC. It gives the *appearance* of WHCO being unaware but allows for many possibilities. — PolitiTweet.org
Eric Columbus @EricColumbus
@jonathanvswan @Bencjacobs But that NSC statement leaves open the possibility that Trump’s defense team was briefed… https://t.co/vBNTL17tR5
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
Bingo. But even if we are to allow for that distinction it still requires believing that the WH Counsel, the person leading Trump’s impeachment defense, was aware of the manuscript but didn’t review it. — PolitiTweet.org
Maggie Haberman @maggieNYT
One thing to note - it says “reviewed,” doesn’t say aware of https://t.co/UCqdkXMyKq
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
Why this matters: Given that White House counsel Pat Cipollone is not part of the NSC, this statement gives the app… https://t.co/zWfTLIEnOb — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
This additional statement from the White House underscores what have become increasingly tense conversations inside… https://t.co/8XiUi8Wrx4 — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @jaketapper: .@MittRomney tells @mkraju: : “I can't begin to tell you how John Bolton's testimony would ultimately play on a final decis… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @burgessev: Romney has always wanted to hear from Bolton, but this is new: "I think it's increasingly likely that other Republicans wi… — PolitiTweet.org
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
RT @ByronYork: Much talk about WH claims of privilege if Bolton testifies. But Bolton has already changed the game. He has put down his acc… — PolitiTweet.org
