Jonathan Swan

@jonathanvswan ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 28, 2020

Created

Mon Jan 27 16:02:33 +0000 2020

Likes

595

Retweets

180

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan

Indeed. It’s a very carefully worded statement from the NSC. It gives the *appearance* of WHCO being unaware but allows for many possibilities. — PolitiTweet.org

@jonathanvswan @Bencjacobs But that NSC statement leaves open the possibility that Trump’s defense team was briefed… https://t.co/vBNTL17tR5

Posted Jan. 27, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan

Bingo. But even if we are to allow for that distinction it still requires believing that the WH Counsel, the person leading Trump’s impeachment defense, was aware of the manuscript but didn’t review it. — PolitiTweet.org

One thing to note - it says “reviewed,” doesn’t say aware of https://t.co/UCqdkXMyKq

Posted Jan. 27, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan

RT @Phil_Mattingly: Collins reiterates she is likely to vote in favor of considering subpoenas for witnesses and docs, noting Bolton revela… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 27, 2020 Retweet Hibernated