Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 186 of 3941.
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @washingtonpost: Trump’s Jan. 6 subpoena is expected soon. But what happens next? If Trump resists the subpoena, the select committee f… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @MarkRuffalo: You heard it. Pence says they will take away a woman’s right to her body & her choice once they get back into control. The… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @thedailybeast: The bad news is that the XBB subvariant of Omicron is likely the most immune-evasive. The good news is that the new “biv… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @Phil_Lewis_: Arizona GOP candidate who said he wanted “our children protected [from] the progressive left" was arrested for masturbatin… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@dbellamum Very happy for your daughter! 😁👍 — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: (🎂) BIRTHDAY: Today is the 1-year birthday of RETRO, one of the Top 10 History media outlets on Substack. To celebrate, a… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
But there’s a serious “but” here. The “but” is that almost no effort at all has been put into investigating *any* of the leads already extant that’d lead to the development of additional evidence on Seditious Conspiracy as to Trump. So it’s not a case they *want* to try to make. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
But it would be a tight case for sure, and so far DOJ and the FBI have shown no stomach to bring even *100% slam-dunk cases* against Trump. So there is no indication at present that they would bring forward a case that would be a long slog and a tough haul to get to a conviction. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
I think when we consider Willful Blindness doctrine, the Reasonable Person standard, and the facts of the case taken in their totality federal prosecutors could probably prove that Trump knew or should have known that he was abed with men who planned to use or encourage violence. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
What you have instead from the Stop the Steal leaders are (i) strong *implications* of possible violence, (ii) vague statements about law enforcement being unable to physically stop a mob that wants to get past it, and (iii) rhetoric that unambiguously analogized 1/6 to a *war*. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
If historical precedent situates force as violence the problem prosecutors would face is that while the USSS told Trump days before 1/6 that the situation would be unsafe—I suspect they said (and knew) that meant violence—the Stop the Steal leaders avoided *advocating* violence. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
One sticking point would be the legal definition of force. Obviously breaking and entering a federal building *can* involve illegal force applied to a point of entrance and entering en masse a building known to be defended by armed law enforcement *ordinarily* does require force. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
The House January 6 Committee essentially skipped over the most damning evidence, which was Trump (and USSS elements) arranging with the Stop the Steal radicals to link the Ellipse speech and an event at the Capitol. Alexander was fairly clear beforehand on force being required. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
I agree the bar is high. The focus would be on Trump asking Jones, Alexander and Stone to lead the march after i) the USSS told him days before 1/6 it’d likely get violent and ii) all three were using violent rhetoric and Alexander was outlining plans implicitly requiring force. — PolitiTweet.org
Asha Rangappa @AshaRangappa_
As much as I’d love for Trump to be held accountable for the violence on Jan. 6, I have not yet seen any public evi… https://t.co/ukQnxfzdFd
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
It’s a squeaker! — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
(POLL) Who was right? (See first tweet in thread.)
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: I can’t find a picture of Kimberly Guilfoyle online, so instead I’m posting this photo of California Governor Gavin Newso… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: 6/ I expect two more entries in the “Lost Classics of the 1960s” series between now and Halloween, one on hard rock (the… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: (🎂) BIRTHDAY: Today is the 1-year birthday of RETRO, one of the Top 10 History media outlets on Substack. To celebrate, a… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: (🎂) BIRTHDAY: Today is the 1-year birthday of RETRO, one of the Top 10 History media outlets on Substack. To celebrate, a… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: (🎂) BIRTHDAY: Today is the 1-year birthday of RETRO, one of the Top 10 History media outlets on Substack. To celebrate, a… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
@JenOLoughlin I think so too! 👻 — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
Democrats have historically been *much better* for the economy than Republicans. Fifty years of economic data confirms it. What Republicans are far better at is *falsely demonizing their opponents* over the economy. Any voter who has been paying attention since 1980 knows this. — PolitiTweet.org
The New York Times @nytimes
No Republican members of Congress voted for the climate law that earmarked tens of billions of dollars to create a… https://t.co/QpnKoS53Na
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @CBSEveningNews: BREAKING: Police have responded to a suspicious vehicle parked near Capitol Hill and have made a weapons arrest. @MacFa… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
RT @SethAbramson: (🎂) BIRTHDAY: Today is the 1-year birthday of RETRO, one of the Top 10 History media outlets on Substack. To celebrate, a… — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
8/ So I hope you’ll consider supporting my work at RETRO; I hope it acts as a “positive” counterbalance to PROOF. It’s also tied for the least-expensive media outlet on Substack—especially with the current subscription deal—so thanks for considering it! 😁 https://t.co/LAl0j06vL7 — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
7/ I sometimes get accused of being doom-and-gloom—of running a feed that encourages “doom-scrolling.” What I usually say in response is that we’re in the Darkest Timeline and I can’t/won’t lie about it. It’s also why I run RETRO: to celebrate all the awesome stuff in the world. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
6/ I expect two more entries in the “Lost Classics of the 1960s” series between now and Halloween, one on hard rock (the first time I’ve written on this subject) and one on the sorta-creepy subgenre known as “bubblegum.” In the meantime, there’s this (🔓): https://t.co/WmaXEhsF1D — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
5/ In the second half of October RETRO is celebrating the one-year anniversary of its founding by publishing 7 articles in 14 days, a fecund stretch for a site that already has a ton of content. Here’s a recent article from the site’s birthday celebration: https://t.co/Y3ItWlnj3w — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
4/ I’ve had a strange life, and RETRO gives me a chance to write about it while also providing content I think folks will find very entertaining. The videos in this edition of “The Best Videos on the Internet” offer a chance to focus on amazing—but *positive*—things in the world. — PolitiTweet.org
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
3/ Case-in-point: in the report atop this thread I write for the first time on my baseball career, including a hospitalization I had during that career, a crime I committed during that career, a psychological disorder I developed during that career, and—more happily—my successes. — PolitiTweet.org
