Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 83 of 1964.

Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Biden doing a lot of this. To by relief and delight https://t.co/ZgcYbzw3vn — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 2, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

He is doing much of this. Delighted https://t.co/k2w79u8OpF — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 2, 2022 Deleted after 37 seconds
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Soaring, tough, blunt and urgent. Trying to separate GOP vs MAGA. No place for political violence. Ever. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 2, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@TheRickWilson @MuellerSheWrote #3: https://t.co/8CFrgY5pQr — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ThirdWayMattB Surprised there aren’t top secret docs on the carpet — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@renato_mariotti But right now the govt has the docs so the EP issue is kinda beside the point — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@rgoodlaw This of course is totally incoherent even for a Trump appointee — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@stevenportnoy And as long as IC review ongoing she is implicitly decide there is no EP so I haven’t got a clue what she is talking about — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@stevenportnoy He can’t assert exec prob because he is not president and the exec branch has it. If this is what she is saying she’s incredibly incompetent, uniformed or acting in bad faith. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@harrylitman But if the IC review is ongoing there is no EP at issue right? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@AWeissmann_ Needless to say the reporting we have gotten so far is confusing, incomplete and somewhat incoherent. This is why courtrooms should remain open — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ReporterBlayne @frankthorp This makes no sense. He has to testify about conversations with Trump and GA officials — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ElectProject taking the 5th for sure — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@renato_mariotti no idea what their defense is let alone their strategy — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Likewise, the grand jury may inquire into Senator Graham’s alleged communications and coordination with the Trump Campaign and its post-election efforts in Georgia, as well as into Senator Graham’s public statements related to Georgia’s 2020 elections.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@harrylitman doesn't seem all that a compromise if you look at what he's going to have to testify about .. it's another DA win cc: @steve_vladeck @NormEisen — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

entire ball of wax/ take the 5th? “Senator Graham may be questioned about any alleged efforts to 'cajole' or encourage Raffensperger or other Georgia election officials to throw out ballots or otherwise alter Georgia’s election practices and procedures." https://t.co/WkDWPWeRfz — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@harrylitman narrator: these are not defenses — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@NormEisen On brand — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Republicans reflexively rejected popular items. Republicans did not take women seriously. Rs made election into Trump referendum. Nominated a fleet of election deniers. Rs advance unpopular, loony ideas. Rs defend special interests. https://t.co/8CFrgY5pQr — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Ginni Thomas pressed Wisconsin lawmakers to overturn Biden’s 2020 victory .. just another insurrectionist https://t.co/PwvUlAp82a — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @BarbMcQuade: As views of former DOJ lawyers from GOP administrations attest, appointing a special master to review Mar-a-Lago documents… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022 Retweet
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @PostOpinions: Former GOP Justice lawyers, from @JRubinBlogger: Trump’s in a heap of trouble https://t.co/jnnl8DecYY — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022 Retweet
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

other than abortion bans may be single dumbest move this cycle. You want the guys forcing you to pay or the guys who gave you a break? Forget the merits. The politics are HORRIBLE — PolitiTweet.org

Tony Romm @TonyRomm

NEW: Republican attorneys general, conservative groups are readying potential lawsuits to block Biden’s student deb… https://t.co/b9Vb7UmVjw

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

“If I had managed, when I left the DOJ as DAG, to take with me # of highly classified docs and had similarly resisted efforts of the government to get them back, I would certainly have been prosecuted, likely ended up in prison," former GOP top official https://t.co/EaaAjuHaGW — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

“Even if there was a legal basis for appointing a special master in this case, which there is not, that appointment would be unnecessary because executive privilege will not apply to any of the seized records as against the Executive Branch.” https://t.co/EaaAjuZjV4 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Reupping this. I count SIX who may come into this category between Jan 6 and Espionagegate https://t.co/cplN93Uu8U — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Reupping this. I count 5 who may come into this category between Jan 5 and Espionagegate https://t.co/cplN94cDn2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022 Deleted after 3 minutes Just a Typo
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@NoahBookbinder I think the legal term is "confession" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022
Profile Image

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

To be clear: Trump has NO defense. He has not raised declassification nonsense. He left office with docs that didn't belong to him and contain some of the country's top secrets. He's got no where to go. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 1, 2022