Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 499 of 1964.
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@hshaban @BrendanNyhan but he is going to let him walk because HE delayed the trial. This is beneath contempt. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
RT @jonathanalter: .@RepSwalwell saying on MSNBC that lots of potential witnesses declined to testify. This--and clear decision of Republic… — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@ron_fournier @matthewjdowd and really bad press behavior in obsessing over this cause a dozen folks on twitter really wanted to see the whites of her eyes. SEVEN R's just voted to convict and the frigging House R leader confessed they proved their case — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@RonBrownstein they will pull back because a congresswoman testifies in person not by affidavit?? @StaceyPlaskett explained there WERE NO other useful witnesses. I cannot conceive of someone saying if only i had seen her on TV instead of heard her words it would have mattered. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@ron_fournier @matthewjdowd Agree entirely — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
Frankly McConnell's concession that they proved the case was the best public education Ds could have hoped for. They should replay that a zillion times — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@RonBrownstein any other witnesses beyond her. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@RonBrownstein The public was not going to be any more convinced by one witness. The managers just explained they did not have any witnesses. Where is the mythical yet to be convinced voter? — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@joshgerstein Dumb. There is no constitutional right to avoid impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@GlennKesslerWP classic fact checker moment!! — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@ElieNYC @kurtbardella and whoever was convinced was already convinced. you are inventing a mythical person who would have been educated if only she showed in person. Did you listen to McConnell? Being upset at losing the show is not tied to any reality. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@RonBrownstein Chance for what? The evidence convinced every convincible person in and outside the senate. It did not change the result, the public's knowledge or history. I am disappointed but as Raskin just explained utterly the right call under the circumstances — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@StevenTDennis inexcusable @robportman - weak, craven, irresponsible. His career is over so why not do the right thing? Nah. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
Pelosi is just magnificent — PolitiTweet.org
Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1
Pelosi condemns the possibility of censuring Trump in the Senate: "Oh, these cowardly senators who couldn’t face up… https://t.co/tfRd69kadD
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
the press is awful... dwelling on this point THAT is now MOOT because of what McConnell said shows how unthoughtful they are, what a pack mentality. @StaceyPlaskett is right to slam them — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
Raskin is right - these questions are dumb, McConnell conceded they proved the case — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
Pelosi is brilliantly turning this back on McConnell who is a moral disgrace — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
She is not only right but brilliantly setting the news cycle — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
Pelosi is just slaying McConnell — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@StaceyPlaskett makes an excellent case for why not necessary for live witnesses, potential for extended procedural fight. She is really excellent. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
House managers utterly vindicated. They got every vote possible. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@BuzzFeedNews Burr and Toomey who are retiring did the right thing but not Portman!! — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@SenMikeLee You shouldn’t hold office in system conclusively decided on a democracy — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
The House managers did their job beyond anyone's expectation. The Senate Rs are corrupt. The rightwing media is corrupt. Now get back to work, passing an agenda to help people and making sure voters know the amoral Rs are a threat to US 3/3 — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
The record was made for history and for everyone conceivably persuadable. Defense counsel would have and did dispute any evidence in whatever form cause they lie. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
There were people educated by a trial that revealed far more evidence of guilt. W got further education by knowledge of @GOPLeader's mendacity and Trump's willful endangerment. There is NO universe of people persuadable after that who'd be convinced by her live testimony. 1/3 — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
The population of people who would change their mind cause congresswoman didn’t appear in person is zero — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@MaxBoot Sunday shows, 60 minutes, pm cable all get big audiences — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@MaxBoot You’d be surprised how few Americans are watching this — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@donwinslow No. No R would have changed. Not one — PolitiTweet.org
