Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

One could not help but notice that today’s Republicans bear no resemblance to Warner. https://t.co/btL7f0yec9 — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

President Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes on households making under $400,000 helped get him elected, but now it is narrowing the path toward a bipartisan deal on infrastructure .. But Rs insistence on no taxes on rich doesn't ??!! https://t.co/EjslSa2Eh8 via @WSJ — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @tribelaw: “The report represents a stunning repudiation of the unsubstantiated claims made by the state’s pro-Trump activists and Trump… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Infrastructure week with infrastructure! Proof Biden does have ability to do bipartisanship, even after a reconciliation on Am Rescue? We'll see https://t.co/4lffhPtfxn — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @JulieZebrak: Since when is it appropriate for a U.S. Senator to refer the @VP by first name only? Oh right it’s not. https://t.co/1k5Y5… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

great conversation — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@danielsilvabook YAY!! — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @EJDionne: There was a time when Republicans were willing to back political reform & voting rights. That party doesn’t exist anymore. Ma… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @ratemyskyperoom: As your humble and doubtless undeserving Room Raters, we are pleased to announce the forthcoming publication of the Of… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@jonathanchait Fascism — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @jonathanchait: National Review on the 1965 Voting Rights Act: it "strikes with the brute and clumsy force of a wrecking ball at the ver… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Failure to hold those who have disgraced DOJ would be a gross miscarriage of justice and an insult to current Worse, it would be a signal to future administrations that there is no price for heeding illegal and unethical direction. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

if he cannot explain to critics that a thorough investigation is not partisan, but an essential part of reasserting legal norms, he is not up to the challenge before him. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

In a sense, Garland is also sheltering former president Donald Trump from investigation, since the only way to understand the extent of his effort to subvert the election is to examine in minute detail his interactions with the Justice Department. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Moreover, in refusing to examine what occurred in the last administration, he is not protecting career attorneys; he is protecting Barr and his political hacks who intervened in prosecutions, looked the other way when a whistleblower revealed Trump's extortion of Ukraine, etc. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

In allowing miscreants to escape accountability (unless Horowitz snares them in his inquiries), Garland has effectively told his department that there are no consequences for unethical or even illegal conduct. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

I can only imagine the reaction from former DOJ lawyers who spent 4 yrs writing pleas to their ex-colleagues to eschew partisan corruption, demanded accountability for attorneys not living up to their oaths and who decried the damage to DOJ's stature. https://t.co/CEOSXTwCND — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Biden is second to none on eulogies — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Eulogy for Warner is such a skewering of today's Rs who have none of his admirable qualities — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@marceelias High praise from the best — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@hunterw but ultimately this is on him.. he took the Tusk advice. Now his political future is nil — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@hunterw no kidding — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Third, as @marceelias argues: fix the certific. process. I would add necc amendments to the Electoral Count Act that make crystal clear neither the vice president nor the House has the power to overturn electoral votes. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

If restaurants have buzzers to tell you when your table is ready, surely polling places can do the same — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

second: Congress could at least fund a national study to see how long people actually wait to vote; when the problem occurs (usually in the morning rush); why waiting times differ so dramatically from precinct to precinct; and tech solutions — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Congress can create national standards for election audits — the people entrusted to conduct them (not partisans); the time-frame to complete them (more than 7 months after the election is ludicrous); and rules about preserving the ballots themselves. https://t.co/Hb1aS4fxCK — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

LOL — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@TheRickWilson awful. just awful. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@EricBoehlert https://t.co/FiMgnTOM6n — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@jamiegangel a little late he might have figured out Jared had an uncanny ability to do the wrong thing and give the wrong advice in nearly every situation — PolitiTweet.org