Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Her recitation of the limits on overturning precedent underscores that all of them cut against reversing abortion rights. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

KBJ's respect for precedent highlights how important this is to restraining judges. She is setting up a strong contrast with how aggressively, activist, how arrogant the court majority has become — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Best questioner of the day : @amyklobuchar worst: stiff competition — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@mkraju that's just nonsense. Which ones? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Klobuchar remains one of the better questioners on the committee — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

shadow docket in context of transparency is an excellent question — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

shadow docket! — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@jentaub none of these guys have revealed ANY reason to oppose her, but almost all if not all, will — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@harrylitman winner buys the other a Berkeley Law tshirt! — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@mkraju Durbin's whimsical reaction is EXACTLY what's wrong with Ds. He should be angry about misrepresentation and Graham's repeated interruption. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

now someone needs to go back to make this point with the witness so no one thinks Graham has a legitimate excuse to oppose her — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

THIS: — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

If a Supreme Court nominee is credibly accused of sexual misconduct, doesn’t the Senate have an obligation to investigate? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

If a justice previously signed on to an ad for an extreme anti-abortion group, should she recuse herself from abortion cases? When critics accuse you of being the beneficiary of “affirmative action,” what does it tell you about their views on race? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. in Shelby County v. Holder opined that preclearance under the Voting Rights Act was no longer necessary since voting discrimination was a thing of the past. Was he wrong, considering the spate of legislation designed to minimize voting access? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Why is it a problem to have a federal judiciary heavily dominated by former prosecutors? Why do you think the six-person majority of justices nominated by Republican presidents almost always wind up on the side of Republicans when it comes to cases on abortion, guns, etc.? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

If only Jackson had a chance to answer these questions: When right-wing justices proclaim a “fetus has an interest in having a life," are they improperly substituting their own religious views for constitutional analysis? https://t.co/1GVW4z8mF4 — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

If only Jackson had a chance to answer these questions: If your husband had attended the rally in D.C. ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, would you feel obliged to recuse yourself from cases related to what transpired that day? https://t.co/1GVW4z8mF4 — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Durban is doing a terrible job allowing the witness to be interrupted . — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ElieNYC Psst: Marriage is a fundamental right. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@DeanObeidallah most of them are too dim to notice — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ElieNYC follow his logic and states could ban marriage (any). — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@ElieNYC it's scary that he was once a judge — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@harrylitman nah, looking for an excuse to vote against so played dumb that amici clients aren't real clients so the brief must be her own. classic Graham leaving in a huff — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@mkraju He gets it. Lawyers represent clients whether they are amici clients or not. He's playing dumb (I think) — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@mkraju Graham pretends amici clients aren't clients, playing dumb to vote against her and please the MAGA crowd — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@harrisonjaime even if it is an amici client. He's lost mental acuity or is pretending to have — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

So long as Rs are free to label Ds “socialists,” they will try to claw way back to power by scaring voters. Ds wise to call them out (” there you go again”), remind voters not only of their accomplishments but of their values and explain the risk of returning Rs to power. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Strongmen often take advantage of those who are more horrified by the other side winning through democratic means than by their own side winning through anti-democratic processes. This is tribalism or “negative partisanship.” https://t.co/Ow2GppkONg — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

This US senator folks. Graham is pretty much disqualifying his own arguments by raving. And Durbin is being too polite, letting Graham model bad behavior — PolitiTweet.org