Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @GregDelawie: The Steady State Endorses Dan Goldman for Election to Congress! Believe me, we need another former prosecutor in Congress… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@tribelaw @lowkell indeed: the clear and present danger Luttig warned us about: https://t.co/YEH1XVhNuw — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

BINGO: — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@mjs_DC @JulieZebrak Indeed. As I will argue for tomorrow, it's the dream of Christian Nationalists to make subsidy of religion a requirement and to thereby eviscerate the establishment clause. Horrible. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@natsechobbyist @dr_seminnis But it won't - which is Breyer's point. Minority religions will be disfavored by lawmakers, exactly the establishment problem the founders tried to avoid. 99.9% of the subsidized schools will be Christian, which is why the Christian nationalists are so thrilled. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@MollyJongFast @mehdirhasan somewhat galling that "I don't want to" is now an acceptable excuse. Why should any American cooperate let alone respond to a subpoena if these guys don't? — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

if he doesn't prosecute, Garland will be under tremendous pressure to justify why the mound of evidence is not enough. If anything, public expectations might be shifting such that a refusal to prosecute would seem shocking to most Americans. https://t.co/uXqHEscW9u — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Whether the alleged scam raises criminal or civil liability will no doubt be the subject of vigorous investigation among state prosecutors, state attorneys general and class-action lawyers. Without the hearings, it’s doubtful that ever would have occurred. https://t.co/uXqHEscW9u — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The serious tenor of the coverage and widespread interest in the evidence have several consequences. The first is that it might influence critical prosecutors, such as Fani Willis in Fulton County, Ga. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The question is no longer about Donald Trump’s role in the attempted coup (there is no doubt his fingerprints are all over it); instead, the country is avidly debating whether there is sufficient evidence of Trump’s corrupt intent to prosecute him for it. https://t.co/uXqHEscW9u — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

another day without forced birth and without eliminating any reasonable restrictions on weapons of war qualifies as a good one. The dystopian hell is postponed at least until Thursday. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

requiring state funds be used for religious education is prime Christian Nationalist stuff. Carson v. Makin. — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

if you feel a sense of impending doom it must be decision day at the Supreme Court — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Rule #1: if illegal conduct unpunished, others will try to do it again. The threat to democracy remains, not just from Trump but also from a whole raft of election deniers. If Trump et. al are not punished, the threat will only worsen. https://t.co/JlbYNqV6Sg — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

NM GOP commission refused to certify the results not because of evidence of fraud but because of “gut feeling and intuition.” This is Trump standard: Doesn’t matter if there is zero evidence of fraud. Sheer delusion is sufficient to violate election laws. https://t.co/JlbYNqV6Sg — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Trump has shown absolutely no hesitation that he is willing to deploy similar tactics in future elections. In fact, he still wrongly insists there is historical precedent for his coup attempt https://t.co/JlbYNqV6Sg — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @tribelaw: “If Mr. Pence has sharper things to say, he may not do so until the fall, when he has a book coming out.” Aha — the inevita… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @11thHour: .@CarolLeonnig on the evidence of Trump’s actions leading up to 1/6: “You have to be willfully blind not to know that you wer… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

“prosecutors would face challenge of showing that he knew — or should have known — that his position was based on assertions about widespread election fraud that were false ”-not the intent required. I really thought I won is NOT a def to probable charges https://t.co/hu0h9ivivr — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Pence could have promptly conceded the race, even if Trump did not. He could have denounced the “big lie.” He could have gone to the FBI or spoken publicly about Trump’s pressure campaign. https://t.co/3JqQWs5Kqm — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

consider all the ways Trump’s allies and supporters could have put an end to the coup plot and spared the country the trauma of Jan. 6… and none of them did https://t.co/3JqQWs5Kqm — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @jentaub: ❗️ @JRubinBlogger is correct — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Surprised he would make this obvious error: Many have noted that Mr. Trump can plausibly defend these charges by arguing that he lacked criminal intent because he truly believed that massive voter fraud had taken place. No. That’s motive. https://t.co/euUBMMPGyi — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

Threatening, extorting, bribing or cajoling election officials to “find” or “fix” votes must be strictly prohibited. Likewise, penalties must be increased for attempting to disrupt or interfere with the admin of an election https://t.co/hxptxKQOj8 — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

The ECA reforms that negotiators have discussed, if in place in 2020, could have acted as a tripwire — if not a complete barrier — to the efforts to overturn the election. https://t.co/hxptxKQOj8 — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @PostOpinions: The Jan. 6 hearings show urgency of Electoral Count Act reform, @JRubinBlogger writes https://t.co/mKmaWqmBsR — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@SallyGold @Lis_Smith @BilldeBlasio @nypost @nypmetro Whiner @danielsgoldman — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

@pollreport Went from 7 to 3% gap — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

RT @OpinionToday: icymi Fox News Poll: 39% approve of the job the Supreme Court is doing, 48% disapprove; two years ago, 54% approved and… — PolitiTweet.org

Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger

6 in 10 Americans say Trump should be charged for Jan. 6 riot: POLL - ABC News.. remarkable since you can’t get60% to agree on much of anything https://t.co/GBIadsmMRx — PolitiTweet.org