Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 123 of 1964.
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@Fla_Pol @DavidJollyFL @RonDeSantisFL @AGGancarski Never happen. One would need to move. Egos could not co-exist. DeSantis doesn't need Trump — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@pbump @RobHembree I CRITICIZE using an anonymous source, quoting a piece that did. Read carefully please. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@JessicaPost @mintimm @RSLC the face of the GOP. pay attention, Dems. Make this guy famous — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@pbump couldn't agree more: https://t.co/eeUMvJC5kY — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
for those who know DOJ this tension is utterly commonplace and gets resolved right after hearings. the piece actually has very little to suggest anything out of the ordinary. cc: @NormEisen https://t.co/vvrpNNEnLe — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@NormOrnstein distressing they seem this inept — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
RT @HerbieZiskend46: This. .@JRubinBlogger: "The outrage is not that the White House is doing too little to rectify the forced-birth crowd… — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
RT @PostOpinions: A plea to the media from @JRubinBlogger: Stop regurgitating anonymous GOP attacks https://t.co/2HPqy2678Z — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
The Jan. 6 committee has so far exercised due diligence and relied almost exclusively on named witnesses. The media should do the same. https://t.co/lml561FlzR — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
unless they have new factual information that meet the standards for anonymous sourcing, respectable publications should not afford anonymity to those offering takes from Trump’s camp. https://t.co/lml561FlzR — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
Creating a false equivalence between detailed testimony under oath and an anonymous source vouching for Trump is misleading at best and at worse serves the Trump camp’s disinformation machine. https://t.co/lml561FlzR — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
someone got anonymity for this?! “One Trump associate, speaking on condition of anonymity, downplayed the impact of Ms. Hutchinson’s testimony, acknowledging that it painted a picture of Mr. Trump as unhinged ..but saying this should surprise no one ” https://t.co/lml561FlzR — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
The avalanche anoyn claims served only to smear the sole witness publicly testifying under oath. Nearly lost in the coverage was the anonymous source’s confirmation of the devastating fact that Trump was outraged at not being able to join the armed mob https://t.co/lml561FlzR — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@rgoodlaw "Michael Zeldin, another former federal prosecutor and former CNN analyst. 'You can have a good-faith belief that you really won an election, but it wouldn’t give you the right to shoot senators who said that you lost.'" — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
RT @rgoodlaw: Former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb: "There are many damning facts” (referencing Hutchinson's testimony Trump knew his… — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@MichelleSteelCA This 5 questions need to be asked of every R who voted vs. impeachment. Nothing else really matters. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@MichelleSteelCA 1. Did Trump betray his country? 2.Why did you vote vs. impeachment? 3. Why did you vote vs. Jan. 6 commission? 4. How can voters trust you to defend the Constitution? 5. would you vote for the guy who led armed mob to Capitol to undo election? — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@RepLizCheney: too many R's "willing hostages"; painful for Rs to accept Trump led armed mob to undo election; shoutout to 5 Dem women on Armed Services; to young women- men mostly run things and "not going all that well"; high praise for Cassidy H; no "bystanders" in democ — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@RepLizCheney 's speech at Reagan Library could pass for a presidential campaign kick-off. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@BoldProgressive @KarenAttiah @AOC and the states! — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
Cassidy Hutchinson Changes Everything <-- a constitutional seminar ! a guide for the perplexed https://t.co/Y433MVCdCm — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@tribelaw I feel like I won the law school lottery today. From Larry, much appreciated — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@NormEisen wow, deeply appreciated — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@joshtpm oopsie. why only testimony under oath matters — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@Fritschner @jaketapper I had same question. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@nhannahjones Dobbs is exactly that. Will be looked back upon as barbaric denigration of women. Law students will stunned justices could have gotten it so wrong. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
@NBCPolitics @MeetThePress oh. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
The fight to defend Americans’ privacy cannot be won going issue by issue. Instead, there must be a coalition to stand against the Christian nationalist movement to return the country to the 19th century. Attacking the WH (!) only impairs this. https://t.co/wgTFbp3yTC — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
There are battles up and down the ballot: from district attorneys and sheriffs to state lawmakers and governors to the House and Senate. If Democrats succeed, they can codify Roe v. Wade and other privacy rights and reform the SCt, a Pelosi is trying to do https://t.co/wgTFbp3yTC — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin @JRubinBlogger
This battle must be waged in Congress, state legislatures, state courts and in public referenda. Some complain they are asked to “vote harder”; in reality, their marching orders are to organize with the same effectiveness as forced-birth advocates. https://t.co/wgTFbp3yTC — PolitiTweet.org
