(((tedfrank)))

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Just_Chillin70 @LeeSouthwell6 @JeffYoungerTX If there’s evidence of that, it’s not in the record. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@f_daNWO @NephiKindofGuy @davisbcampbell_ @JeffYoungerTX You are confused. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Schilling1776 @jneeley78 If that were really true, you wouldn’t dare work at the Claremont Institute where California authorities could confiscate your wages. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@BartlebyX @mckeds No one broke the law besides the defendant. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@NomadicMicro @mckeds You’re not Jewish. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@dgb49 You jumped to that conclusion, not me. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@thoughtsofavet @Schilling1776 @JeffYoungerTX Sorry that I read the law rather than a layperson’s fictional LARPing about what will happen. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@lurker9876 @Schilling1776 @JeffYoungerTX Then she’s in criminal contempt of court. Hypothetically, groomers could kidnap the child and do the same thing. Speculative fantasies don’t override the law. There’s no evidence she intends to violate the court order and no evidence California courts will act unconstitutionally. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@NephiKindofGuy @davisbcampbell_ @JeffYoungerTX Your understanding is incorrect. There’s a Texas judgment forbidding it, and the US constitution requires California courts to honor it. SB 107 doesn’t override that. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@LeeSouthwell6 @JeffYoungerTX Why? She already agreed not to transition anyone. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@libertarianJD @JeffYoungerTX Did you read the opinion? There’s no evidence she wants to transition anyone: she asked for the injunction and represented to SCOTX that she will not try to evade it. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @TransparencyWTX: @tedfrank @JeffYoungerTX @Schilling1776 Instead of incorrectly claiming that the Texas courts are allowing his kids to… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@JeffYoungerTX @Schilling1776 Feel for you, but that’s why you hire an attorney in September rather than making a procedurally doomed pro se emergency motion in December. If the California courts were going to be so lawless, a new Texas ruling won’t stop them. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@JeffYoungerTX What dissent is there to read? Doesn’t appear to be an opinion? https://t.co/csHD7ILCcf — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Schilling1776 @JeffYoungerTX Full faith and credit clause still exists. Would be illegal for California court to disregard Texas court judgment, even if was inclined to act so lawlessly to ignore the rules of judicial estoppel. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Schilling1776 @JeffYoungerTX But see CAL. FAM. CODE § 3424(d). https://t.co/NowbbWVtxP — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@JeffYoungerTX You also have CAL. FAM. CODE § 3424(d). — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Schilling1776 @jneeley78 Politics hasn’t infected the court entirely. 🤷‍♂️ — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @OrwellNGoode: 23. https://t.co/X6xKMZL4uW — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@JeffYoungerTX Full faith and credit clause still applies, and mother already made a representation to the Texas courts. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @Goofball10x: @LandsharkRides Gotta look closely to see the pizza box in this video telling us he is in Romania! https://t.co/caC1E5ZyM6 — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

So they need a conclave to pick a new Pope Emeritus now, right? — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Schilling1776 @jneeley78 Texas courts still enforce contempt of court. This conspiracy theory is entirely fictional, which is why the mandamus petition was pro se, rather than presented by one of the hundreds of lawyers who would stand up against such abuses. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Schilling1776 @JeffYoungerTX Not true. There’s a court order forbidding transition. https://t.co/iLiLsjKR95 — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@JeffYoungerTX This doesn’t seem true? https://t.co/ryalENPuF7 — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @ClarendonBros: Arlington Sheriff announced recently she would not cooperate with ICE. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @sovietvisuals: Post-Soviet visual — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @bendreyfuss: Greta Thunberg takes down another giant — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @bendreyfuss: Japan had a plan in 1945 called Operation Cherry Blossoms At Night. It involved dropping “bombs” filled with millions of p… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @SaysSimonson: 4/4. even if no one from SAG is on the shoot, the testing protocol remains. it's just a part of the business now, like QR… — PolitiTweet.org