(((tedfrank)))

@tedfrank ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 6, 2023

Created

Sat Dec 31 18:26:55 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPad

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@lurker9876 @Schilling1776 @JeffYoungerTX Then she’s in criminal contempt of court. Hypothetically, groomers could kidnap the child and do the same thing. Speculative fantasies don’t override the law. There’s no evidence she intends to violate the court order and no evidence California courts will act unconstitutionally. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 31, 2022

Preceded By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@NephiKindofGuy @davisbcampbell_ @JeffYoungerTX Your understanding is incorrect. There’s a Texas judgment forbidding it, and the US constitution requires California courts to honor it. SB 107 doesn’t override that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 31, 2022

Followed By

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@thoughtsofavet @Schilling1776 @JeffYoungerTX Sorry that I read the law rather than a layperson’s fictional LARPing about what will happen. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 31, 2022