(((tedfrank)))

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @ChristineHall: Shoplifting deterrents drive down sales https://t.co/wnFEow3RkM — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @3YearLetterman: We’ve had over 50 presidents, many of them great, but one president towers above all others. Ben Franklin literally in… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @LeonHWolf: Not direct to Josh’s point but you have to be a special kind of historically ignorant to conclude that young people today ha… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @bristowbailey: Criminals will start wearing extra prosthetic fingers to make surveillance footage look like it's AI generated and thus… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@guypbenson I can distinguish between "The ideal rule is X" and "The ideal strategy when the rule isn't ideal may be inconsistent with the ideal rule until the rule becomes ideal." But nuance is dead these days, I guess. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@guypbenson I don't see an inconsistency between "The rule should be X, but if the rule isn't X, don't be a sucker and let the other side take advantage of it." — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

Deleted a bunch of Project Veritas tweets because I'm on deadline, and I may have missed some facts, but don't have time to investigate further. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@amuse No, I didn't. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@amuse You can do it, but it requires a lot of paperwork to comply with Schedule J, and then can cause an investigation over whether executive "compensation" is "excessive." https://t.co/Ir342FCjIQ Enough benefits, and you start to run into §4960 problems, though that's just a tax. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

Hey, @greggutfeld @Gutfeldfox : @FoxNews is using Eventbrite to give away free tickets to your show, so left-wing vandals are making fake purchases so your audience will be empty and people like me will be harassed by the resulting emails. Don't use Eventbrite. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@FrankBednarz @RMFifthCircuit Saw the Seventh Circuit demand a motion for leave to file for an adversary—an experienced SCOTUS litigator—who filed his appellate brief at 12:02 am. (Two and a half years since oral argument without a decision in that case.) — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @JimmyPrinceton: CNN live broadcasting Don Lemon’s sensitivity training would do 5x the ratings (at least) of that useless morning show. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@commonsense258 Kto? Kogo? Is he using nonprofit money, or is he using MSNBC money? — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @japecake: Deep inside this @NYTimes story is a notable tidbit neatly summarizing a common objection to #reparations: after LA returned… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Everylastgoat @Cernovich Not if PV has a pending lawsuit against O’Keefe to claw back the money. A lawsuit destroys PV, but board members won’t have a choice if he continues to refuse to talk to them. (Not clear why Cernovich thinks the board didn’t make an offer. The statement implies they did.) — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

Ammo for what? It’s plain to see that PV dies without O’Keefe. The Board isn’t made up of idiots. (In my experience with other nonprofit boards, the bias is towards non action.) Either they investigate or Letitia James investigates, and she won’t want to keep PV alive. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

PV is destroyed either way. This is entirely on O’Keefe. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich Board is in an impossible situation. If they investigate and demand O’Keefe return money, he quits—he quit even before they could make the offer. If they don’t investigate, Letitia James strips the organization of nonprofit status, and bars board members from ever serving. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich This is all on O’Keefe for putting the organization in a no-win situation. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich It was not proposed because O’Keefe refused to speak to the Board. It’s probably still on the table (that’s certainly what the Board statement implies between the lines) but if he doesn’t speak with the board, they’re going to have to sue him (which is also clear from statement). — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

RT @monitoringbias: "Rather than transferring the deed to my property to the Lekwungen peoples I will be affixing this custom-made $1,200 g… — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

https://t.co/8mYRZQZPuC — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich PV has dozens of blue-state AGs and the DOJ gunning for it. They have to dot the i’s and cross the t’s. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich Perhaps. But it’s a bad look to fire him in violation of the bylaws: that triggers the investigation. He just had to play by the rules to show it was bad faith and get the CFO fired for complaining. You can’t risk messing with the IRS, especially if you’re right of center. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich Of course, if the total illegal spending is more than he can reimburse, O’Keefe is in as much of a no-win situation as the Board. But you simply can’t ask a nonprofit to spend $14,000 on a charter flight. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich Would have been very easy for O’Keefe to tell the board “I did this event for earned media and to solicit donations. Maybe it didn’t work, but it was good faith. The CFO’s complaint makes my working with him untenable. Either he goes, or I go.” He wins that easily. /x — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich If the CFO complained about it, and then was fired in violation of the bylaws, the board had to investigate. O’Keefe could have justified it, and chose to kamikaze instead without trying to defend it. Now it gets litigated? Deadly for PV, but also suboptimal for O’Keefe. /1 — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich I don’t think that’s a fair reading of events. They’re legally accountable to enforce the bylaws and tax law. Board has to investigate, they don’t know how much was spent inappropriately. By their accounts, they still don’t know. They know this kills the organization. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

@Cernovich And that’s what would have happened if O’Keefe didn’t quit before they could negotiate that. I don’t understand what you think the Board should’ve done instead. O’Keefe acted unilaterally. — PolitiTweet.org

(((tedfrank))) @tedfrank

If I take a flight, I get reimbursed for a coach ticket. If it’s a cross-country red-eye, and I need to upgrade to first class for my health, that sucks for me, but it’s $500 out of my own pocket—the nonprofit can’t pay for the upgrade. A $14,000 charter flight? Unthinkable. — PolitiTweet.org