Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 106 of 499.
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
Anyone got the TLDR yet? — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @charlie_savage: Embedded in Barr remarks is an important qualifier: Trump campaign collusion with WikiLeaks could not be an illegal con… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @danpfeiffer: 1. Russia interfered 2. They did it to help Trump 3. Trump wanted their help 4. Trump's campaign met with the Russians to… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @mlcalderone: Boston Globe is clear about what Barr did just now: https://t.co/AvO8XRUPLl — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
https://t.co/BDk4jKO7Uw — PolitiTweet.org
Michael Calderone @mlcalderone
Quick scan of post-presser coverage: Some outlets leading with Barr breaking with Mueller's legal theories on obstr… https://t.co/hW3ej5CwyT
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
@TylerDinucci No I’m waiting for this damn report and didn’t realize Barr would leave me a narrow window to make the 7:20 — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
Whether or not that action rises to the level of criminality, it means that Trump campaign associates aided and abetted an attack on our election that helped their candidate win. They cheated. — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer Palmieri @jmpalmieri
Jeremy Bash pinpoints big hole in Barr's argument...Barr leaves open possibility that Trump associates coordinated… https://t.co/5QIUIRY74c
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @KenDilanianNBC: Barr is now issuing what amounts to a White House press release. Even if these are his heartfelt views, this will be s… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
@AkilahObviously It’s ok if you lie so long as you do it in a way that fools the media, becauase then it’s smart and savvy — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @emptywheel: Good news, boys and girls. If you grow up to be President you can't obstruct justice so long as you're frustrated. — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @joshgerstein: Barr word choice and overall framing of the Mueller findings is staggeringly consonant with White House framing and rheto… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
How would the stories have been different three weeks ago if we had known that Barr didn’t indict Trump because he “disagreed” with Mueller’s “legal theories”? — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
@AlyssaMastro44 @stefcutter So me on a turbulent flight — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
Of course, the President’s motive for obstruction could have been corrupt because he was trying to cover up crimes that didn’t have to do with a Russia conspiracy - say, for example, the crime of campaign finance violations, for which he’s been implicated. — PolitiTweet.org
Igor Bobic @igorbobic
Key Barr conclusion: "Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs hea… https://t.co/4tsPX0McHk
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
Yup, he never denied that Trump aides participated in the dissemination of stolen emails. He only said that if they did, it wasn’t illegal. — PolitiTweet.org
Jim Sciutto @jimsciutto
This is key: Barr just declared that the *legal* definition of conspiracy would require that Trump aides had to par… https://t.co/SLqucmIhpp
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
William Barr sounds like a slightly more well-spoken Fox News pundit right now. This is incredible. — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @emptywheel: The way Barr just avoided implicating Stone there was really really really corrupt. He just nodded to Stone's "collusion"… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
Hooo boy — PolitiTweet.org
Josh Gerstein @joshgerstein
BREAKING: Mueller report examines 10 episodes of potential obstruction by Trump. Barr says he and Rosenstein 'disag… https://t.co/Fzc6PGNeYZ
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
Rod Rosenstein looks comfortable — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
@JGreenDC RT if you agree — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
I love when the media praises Trump for successfully spinning the media. — PolitiTweet.org
David Corn @DavidCornDC
.@chucktodd just said @realDonaldTrump and Barr have "successfully neutered" the impact of the Mueller report. That… https://t.co/5aoOc2Cs2F
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @IanSams: Kamala brings the 🔥 when asked about Fox News >> https://t.co/C1FDMcVrG5 — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
@IanSams @PodSaveAmerica She’s welcome back anytime to have that longer conversation, which is one we enjoy having! — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @PodSaveAmerica: .@KamalaHarris talks about why she doesn’t like the question “Who can talk to the midwest?” Full pod out now: https://… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @PodSaveAmerica: .@KamalaHarris talks about why she doesn’t like the question “Who can talk to the midwest?” Full pod out now: https://… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @emptywheel: Again: Every single word of Trump's rebuttal tomorrow is something he refused to say under oath. Every single word. — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @IanSams: @wpjenna @mollyhc @chelsea_janes I’m sorry but this just isn’t true. (1) “Under pressure” - gimme a break. @jonfavs asked her… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
I’m annoyed in advance at the credulous headlines and tweets that will come from Barr’s press conference before anyone has read the report. Again. And those headlines will likely carry the day. Again. — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @PodSaveAmerica: New Pod! @KamalaHarris talks with @jonfavs about her record as a District Attorney and Attorney General, how she’d get… — PolitiTweet.org
Jon Favreau @jonfavs
RT @MEPFuller: Remember how much everyone flipped out about the Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch meeting on the tarmac? https://t.co/v0LIZ8IrRs — PolitiTweet.org
