David Sacks

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Just watched MSNBC coming to grips with what they called Biden’s “extraordinary and highly alarming comments.” Ben Rhodes gamely does his best to minimize the threat (just tac nukes!) but it’s clear their narrative is in tatters. https://t.co/AepuLhEm7N — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

By frankly acknowledging that Putin is not bluffing about potential nuclear use, Biden has exposed virtually the entire pundit class that blithely and irresponsibly dismissed the threat. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@NatashaBertrand Man who can’t think two moves ahead finally realizes where his policy is leading. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Man who can’t think two moves ahead finally realizes where his policy is leading. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

RT @Stephen_Geiger: My blunt view on Russia/Ukraine: I personally don’t think this is worth risking outright war with Russia or the use of… — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@naval mapped out the game theory in a very similar way in our conversation. https://t.co/zSPbze6BER — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@aaroncbailey @jasonlk we did — https://t.co/42gucXyQl9 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@N1Inside American citizen for 40 years. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Extremely compelling analysis of how Ukraine goes nuclear. https://t.co/2HAfFUbby8 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Not a single blue & yellow flag. https://t.co/j6GiuoNdsr — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

We've taken leave of our senses if we think we can delegate the fate of America to this man. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

To be clear, I'm fine not having a view if the US has no involvement. But as long as we're providing the money, weapons, intelligence and plans -- and have boots on the ground -- it requires us to have a view. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

This is the new party line from Kyiv: Americans are not expert enough or virtuous enough to have a view about a conflict that could pull the USA into WWIII. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

RT @RpwWilliams: A great piece by @DavidSacks. The escalation ladder the West and the US are currently climbing defies common sense and Ame… — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@Jason During the Cold War, proxy wars were only fought at the periphery. Especially after the Cuban Missile Crisis, it was considered too dangerous to fight a war close to either country’s homeland (in North America or Europe). So for example: https://t.co/F0GvirhFDQ — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

It’s important to understand that the “Neville Chamberlain” attack (that any diplomacy would be appeasement) fundamentally misunderstands the situation we’re in, which is an escalatory spiral. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

During the Cold War, we had the ability to hold two opposing thoughts in our heads: that the Soviet Union was an evil empire and that nonetheless we would behave carefully and realistically to avoid the risk of nuclear war. We seem to have lost that ability. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@thogge Crimea is majority Russian, wants to be part of Russia, and has been since 2014. Yet taking back Crimea is a Ukrainian war aim, as well as State Department policy. Russia will likely use nukes to defend it. So this doesn’t make sense on any level. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@JoeBiden and @LindseyGrahamSC were elected first and foremost to keep America safe. Having boots on the ground in Ukraine does not do that. Refusing to engage in diplomacy does not do that. Sacrificing our own security for the sake of a foreign country violates your oath. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@thogge Zelensky campaigned on a peace platform. Effectively he was supposed to find a modus vivendi with Russia. That is not what he delivered. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Zelensky campaigned on a peace platform. Effectively he was supposed to find a modus vivendi with Russia. That is not what he delivered. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

RT @ClintEhrlich: It's been an open secret since the beginning of the war that CIA and DoD were both still on the ground in Ukraine. The… — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

The War for Democracy* *except in Crimea and Donbas — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

As it turns out, Tesla doesn’t even benefit from the tax credit anymore, so Graham’s threat wouldn’t even have the intended effect. Which is also how Washington works. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Senator Graham starts a Twitter fight with @elonmusk but doesn’t like getting talked back to, so he threatens to take away an electric vehicle tax credit. This is how Washington works. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@LindseyGrahamSC The Budapest Memorandum does not require the US to defend Ukraine militarily. It’s not a defense treaty. It was not ratified by the US Senate. There was no “guarantee.” This was explained to Ukraine at the time. One of the American negotiators wrote about this in 2014: https://t.co/ql9s0krJjB — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@robustus We’re only watching comedies about World War III. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@TheRideshareGuy @all_in_tok @theallinpod @friedberg @Jason @naval Known bug. Fix coming. Suggest watching on web in the meantime. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@jeffandersoncpa @naval @friedberg Just a joke. 😆 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@all_in_tok @theallinpod @friedberg @Jason @naval The part with Naval is live: https://t.co/ap6BNs5CWv — PolitiTweet.org