David Sacks

David Sacks @DavidSacks

The administration’s position is now: 1. There will be no diplomatic track. 2. Military aid will be virtually unlimited and go on forever. 3. Only Zelensky can decide when and how the war ends. 4. Even though (according to Biden) the war could escalate into Armageddon. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Update: sadly, Progressive Democrats are walking back the letter. Three weeks ago, I wrote that “woke cancellation tactics” were being used to preclude discussion of alternatives to escalation. The cancellation of the letter confirms that. https://t.co/wbypOhT0GK — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

For House of the Dragon fans, a mummer’s farce is when John Kirby claims Zelinsky is the one calling the shots for the U.S. in the Ukraine war. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@MarcBodnick @MaxBoot Actually it is Democrats’ fault that Republicans are going to sweep the midterms. Try to govern better. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@MarcBodnick Perhaps the Democratic Party shouldn’t have helped many of those election deniers win their primaries. https://t.co/XgCBgZORoh — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Elections are how democracies die! — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@mtracey @ggreenwald Yet I think they took some heat for signing. So it shouldn’t be completely dismissed. Baby steps. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@mtracey @ggreenwald The letter makes it impossible to claim that the desire for diplomacy is a pro-Putin MAGA plot. In the current environment, that’s progress. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@popjump Baby steps. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

In any event, Kirby is engaging in passive-aggressive play-acting. The US knows that it has substantial influence over its client Zelensky. But the excuse itself — that the US must delegate its own security to a foreign government — should be unacceptable to every American. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Moreover, as the US has gotten more and more involved in the war, its own security and economy are increasingly at stake. It would be an extraordinary dereliction of duty for an American president to delegate vital US interests to the Ukrainian president. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

As the WashPo reported back in March, Zelensky may have his own domestic political reasons not to make a deal. So his interests may not necessarily fully align with US interests. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

The White House’s reaction to the letter was pathetic, saying that only Zelensky gets to decide. That might be true if we weren’t backing Ukraine with money, weapons and intelligence. But since we are, we should certainly have our own point of view. https://t.co/C5G8hX3YA9 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

As promised. https://t.co/lfozholUSi — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Looks like I’m going to be donating to some Democrats. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@mattyglesias @steven_metz @vc Matt, the topic had moved on. Sorry it was so confusing for you. I know Twitter can be really hard sometimes. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@steven_metz @vc @mattyglesias What growth do woke cancellation mobs allow for when they try to get people fired over decade-old tweets? — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@NicRossier I support the right to self-determination for the people of Ukraine, Crimea, and Donbas. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@ekampf @FareedZakaria @netanyahu Does watching TV require special expertise? Perhaps you lack the expertise to comment on my tweets. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@narnurak @FareedZakaria @netanyahu I do sometimes. One of the better things on CNN (low bar, I know). — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

A similar interview here, with an even starker warning: Netanyahu: this war could spin out of control, including to nuclear war. @JudyWoodruff: but it’s just a conventional war for now… Zero interest in exploring further. Just seeks denunciation. https://t.co/CiDLWiYLrU — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Netanyahu is also very concerned about the risk of nuclear war in Ukraine. One can hear this sentiment from leaders all over the world — except the United States. Our leaders are sleepwalking. https://t.co/EnJWJlvIg8 — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

.@FareedZakaria: why did you have a love affair with Putin? @netanyahu: you mean that time I tried to avoid a war with Russia in Syria? This is the state of American media now. Wanting to avoid war makes you a Putin lover. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@mattyglesias That was a typo: “cynical” not “cyclical.” For example: your excitement over “everyone explode their weapons as fast as they can make them,” with body counts to match. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@vc @mattyglesias That was a typo: “cynical” not “cyclical.” For example: @mattyglesias’ excitement over “everyone explode their weapons as fast as they can make them,” with body counts to match. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Sachs directly corroborates what I wrote in March: this war was preventable, but the State Department refused to compromise on NATO’s open door policy. https://t.co/4jKW82L6dx — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Prof Jeffrey Sachs: “The White House refused any negotiations.” https://t.co/lpEPtRSunJ — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

RT @mtracey: CBS gets an exclusive sneak peak: "The US Army's 101st Airborne is practicing for war with Russia just miles from Ukraine's bo… — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@NSAtookmyID @vc @mattyglesias I’ve already addressed both issues in my tweets. 1) None. (Now please demand to know who funds ISW and RDI.) 2) see George Beebe’s analysis that I’ve previously tweeted. — PolitiTweet.org

David Sacks @DavidSacks

@vc @mattyglesias The woke-neocon alliance is both naively idealistic and deeply cyclical. — PolitiTweet.org