David Sacks

@DavidSacks ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 29, 2022

Created

Mon Oct 24 19:30:24 +0000 2022

Likes

827

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

David Sacks @DavidSacks

Moreover, as the US has gotten more and more involved in the war, its own security and economy are increasingly at stake. It would be an extraordinary dereliction of duty for an American president to delegate vital US interests to the Ukrainian president. — PolitiTweet.org

The United States of America can and should support Ukraine but it can never delegate its security to a foreign hea… https://t.co/mp52KinLPR

Posted Oct. 24, 2022

Preceded By

David Sacks @DavidSacks

As the WashPo reported back in March, Zelensky may have his own domestic political reasons not to make a deal. So his interests may not necessarily fully align with US interests. — PolitiTweet.org

So if the story is true, the US foreign policy establishment believes that a peace deal to avert WWIII (their term)… https://t.co/O5TsYRZc09

Posted Oct. 24, 2022

Followed By

David Sacks @DavidSacks

In any event, Kirby is engaging in passive-aggressive play-acting. The US knows that it has substantial influence over its client Zelensky. But the excuse itself — that the US must delegate its own security to a foreign government — should be unacceptable to every American. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 24, 2022