Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 15, 2019

Created

Wed Dec 04 00:12:38 +0000 2019

Likes

3,563

Retweets

1,315

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

In fact, Vindman actually undermined his *own* claim. Note page 256 of his deposition, where he gets pressed on whether Trump "demanded" anything: Vindman eventually admits: "I guess you can interpret it in different ways." Trump didn't demand anything. https://t.co/51IXPHVzvA — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Additionally, Tim Morrison, Vindman's SUPERIOR, testified and directly undermined Vindman's interpretation. Morrison says there was NO "demand" at all. https://t.co/waaWNQYCo4 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

3) Democrats rely enormously on Gordon Sondland. His name appears over 600 times (!) in their report. FLASHBACK: When Gordon Sondland was asked if he had any evidence @realDonaldTrump tied aid to investigations, Sondland said no—"other than my own presumption." https://t.co/4Ff4QHkimG — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019