Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 15, 2019

Created

Wed Dec 04 00:12:37 +0000 2019

Likes

3,841

Retweets

1,415

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Additionally, Tim Morrison, Vindman's SUPERIOR, testified and directly undermined Vindman's interpretation. Morrison says there was NO "demand" at all. https://t.co/waaWNQYCo4 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

2) Democrats claim @realDonaldTrump "demanded" Ukraine investigations. They build their case on this using Alexander Vindman, who said he interpreted the call this way too. The "demand" characterization is ridiculous, for many reasons. @RepChrisStewart lays out a few. https://t.co/om6xhHozCT — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

In fact, Vindman actually undermined his *own* claim. Note page 256 of his deposition, where he gets pressed on whether Trump "demanded" anything: Vindman eventually admits: "I guess you can interpret it in different ways." Trump didn't demand anything. https://t.co/51IXPHVzvA — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019