Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 7, 2019

Created

Tue Nov 19 17:53:58 +0000 2019

Likes

3,141

Retweets

1,284

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

What this hearing boils down to: Col. Vindman claimed to be alarmed at the 7/25 call because he felt the conversation was a "demand." It was not. Read the call transcript. Note the phrases like "if that's possible," "if you can look into it," "whatever you can do." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

This is an excellent job by @RepChrisStewart. He's getting to the heart of the issue -- that the characterization of the 7/25 phone call as a "demand" (by both Chairman Schiff and Lt. Col. Vindman) is total nonsense. We can all read the transcript. There is zero demand there. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

IN FACT: when Col. Vindman was pressed on his characterization of the call as a "demand" in his deposition (p. 256), this is what he said: "I think people want to hear, you know, what they have as already preconceived notions... I guess you can interpret it in different ways." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2019