Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 7, 2019

Created

Tue Nov 19 17:29:36 +0000 2019

Likes

3,555

Retweets

1,370

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

This is an excellent job by @RepChrisStewart. He's getting to the heart of the issue -- that the characterization of the 7/25 phone call as a "demand" (by both Chairman Schiff and Lt. Col. Vindman) is total nonsense. We can all read the transcript. There is zero demand there. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

In his deposition, page 154 and page 259, Col. Vindman said himself he was “reporting to chain of command.” Morrison was his senior, and he didn’t know about it. You’re pushing back against Vindman’s words. Not mine. — PolitiTweet.org

He didn't go outside the "chain of command." It's the NSC, not the military. He has the right to talk to NSC lawyer… https://t.co/FIp3DVHP1N

Posted Nov. 19, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

What this hearing boils down to: Col. Vindman claimed to be alarmed at the 7/25 call because he felt the conversation was a "demand." It was not. Read the call transcript. Note the phrases like "if that's possible," "if you can look into it," "whatever you can do." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2019