Kevin Faulconer

@Kevin_Faulconer ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 16, 2019

Created

Mon Jun 17 19:33:56 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Kevin Faulconer @Kevin_Faulconer

The team recommended data-informed assignment of priority levels and a timeframe for which a client would be reassessed throughout their stay in the shelter. This will allow providers to track the progress of individuals as they move toward housing-ready status. 4/8 https://t.co/SmcNhytJPF — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2019

Preceded By

Kevin Faulconer @Kevin_Faulconer

The first finding found inconsistencies in the process used to assess a client’s readiness for housing. Upon entering the shelter, clients are assigned a Priority Level (1-4) - 1 being most ready for housing and 4 being clients with significant needs to prepare for housing. 3/8 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2019

Followed By

Kevin Faulconer @Kevin_Faulconer

The second finding focused on the wide-ranging needs each case manager addresses. Currently, case managers are assigned to clients across all priority levels. To streamline, the team advised splitting the caseload into two groups so managers can work more efficiently. 5/8 https://t.co/tTVY4LcphX — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2019