Kevin Faulconer

@Kevin_Faulconer ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 16, 2019

Created

Mon Jun 17 19:33:56 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Kevin Faulconer @Kevin_Faulconer

The first finding found inconsistencies in the process used to assess a client’s readiness for housing. Upon entering the shelter, clients are assigned a Priority Level (1-4) - 1 being most ready for housing and 4 being clients with significant needs to prepare for housing. 3/8 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2019

Preceded By

Kevin Faulconer @Kevin_Faulconer

The City’s Performance & Analytics Dept. performed an extensive analysis of our bridge shelters by conducting thorough interviews with onsite staff and outreach workers as well as delving deep into client data. Here are some of their findings and recommendations. 2/8 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2019

Followed By

Kevin Faulconer @Kevin_Faulconer

The team recommended data-informed assignment of priority levels and a timeframe for which a client would be reassessed throughout their stay in the shelter. This will allow providers to track the progress of individuals as they move toward housing-ready status. 4/8 https://t.co/SmcNhytJPF — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 17, 2019