Laurence Tribe

@tribelaw ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 17, 2021

Created

Mon Jun 15 19:29:14 +0000 2020

Likes

1,108

Retweets

142

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

5. that can’t change the fact that this but-for test “is the law,” as the majority rightly says. The dissenters accuse the majority of “legislation.” They are wrong. And their claim that Congress couldn’t *possibly* have “meant to protect a disfavored group” (go to #6): — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 15, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

4. What’s undeniable is that the employers treated some individuals worse than others because of “such individual’s sex” as defined by their biological characteristics. The dissents call the statute’s but-for causation test “legalistic, ... wooden or literal.” But (go to #5): — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 15, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

6. barely conceals what the majority rightly identifies as “a cynicism” that belies claims to neutrality in adjudication. The majority rightly held that “an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender defies the law.” (Go to #7): — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 15, 2020 Hibernated