Profile Image

Laurence Tribe

@tribelaw ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked May 19, 2020

Created

Sat Jul 27 13:21:33 +0000 2019

Likes

496

Retweets

286

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

The 5-4 Court wrongly treated a claim that DOD proposed to spend money without the needed appropriation as an attempt to “review” DOD’s compliance with sec. 8005. No! As @marty_lederman points out, sec. 8005 is the Government’s DEFENSE, not part of the plaintiffs’ case. — PolitiTweet.org

Marty Lederman @marty_lederman

1/ The Court's stay in the Wall case is indefensible. "The Government has made a sufficient showing at this stage t… https://t.co/lM20sJd6u3

Posted July 27, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

For a federal court to rule against the House Judiciary Committee’s invocation of Rule 6(e) on the basis that its impeachment inquiry hasn’t been authorized by the full House would violate the separation of powers: that’s an internal House matter. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 27, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

The investigatory superpowers of the House are triggered by the FACT that an impeachment inquiry is now underway, not by the FORM of what triggered it. Otherwise the House would have to label what it wants to do before getting the information it needs. https://t.co/JRUv9oP3W8 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 27, 2019 Hibernated