Laurence Tribe

@tribelaw ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 19, 2020

Created

Sat Jul 27 11:33:56 +0000 2019

Likes

1,785

Retweets

598

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

For a federal court to rule against the House Judiciary Committee’s invocation of Rule 6(e) on the basis that its impeachment inquiry hasn’t been authorized by the full House would violate the separation of powers: that’s an internal House matter. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 27, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

The House has not passed a formal resolution telling the committee to open impeachment proceedings, but no such step is needed: federal judges have been impeached, convicted, and removed from office without it. https://t.co/S3mDJojcaQ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 27, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

The 5-4 Court wrongly treated a claim that DOD proposed to spend money without the needed appropriation as an attempt to “review” DOD’s compliance with sec. 8005. No! As @marty_lederman points out, sec. 8005 is the Government’s DEFENSE, not part of the plaintiffs’ case. — PolitiTweet.org

1/ The Court's stay in the Wall case is indefensible. "The Government has made a sufficient showing at this stage t… https://t.co/lM20sJd6u3

Posted July 27, 2019 Hibernated