Eric Geller

@ericgeller ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 22, 2021

Created

Mon Nov 30 17:24:47 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Eric Geller @ericgeller

Sotomayor summarizes the concern that several other justices have been hinting at: “You’re asking us to write definitions to narrow what could otherwise be viewed as a very broad statute, and dangerously vague.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Eric Geller @ericgeller

Feigin: I think your concern arises from the way in which Fisher teed up this case for you. He’s suggesting that the only way to avoid the “parade of horribles” is to define those terms better. I think it's pretty clear that the CFAA doesn't cover the examples he cited. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Eric Geller @ericgeller

Kagan: Do you concede that, without the word "so" in the CFAA, you would lose this case?" Fisher: “I think it would be a much tougher case for us without the word ‘so,’ Your Honor.” We are truly getting into the weeds here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated Just a Typo