Eric Geller

@ericgeller ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 22, 2021

Created

Mon Nov 30 17:06:59 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Eric Geller @ericgeller

Barrett is pushing Fisher over his definition of "authorization," expressing skepticism of his idea that it's "an on/off switch." She asks why the Court shouldn't view authorization as being inherently dependent on the purpose of the access. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Eric Geller @ericgeller

Gorsuch: If the CFAA doesn't cover these kinds of things, but there are other, more troublesome activities, like what you client did, are there other laws that could cover those offenses? Fisher: Yes. Every offense that the government wants covered is covered by another law. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Eric Geller @ericgeller

Fisher: We don’t think the CFAA treats authorization in that way. And given that other statutes do that, we think that’s evidence that Congress didn’t intend to do that here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated