PolitiTweet Archive
Home Figures About
Donate
Profile Image

Eric Geller

@ericgeller ↗

  • Overview
  • Archive
  • Deleted
Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked Feb. 22, 2021

Created

Mon Nov 30 16:59:22 +0000 2020

Likes

45

Retweets

8

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Eric Geller @ericgeller

At issue is what it means to criminalize "obtaining or altering information" from a computer system in a manner that violates the terms under which you are allowed to access the computer. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Eric Geller @ericgeller

The justices keep asking Fisher to explain how the CFAA would criminalize seemingly innocuous things. Kagan just asked about checking Instagram at work. Fisher says that would violate CFAA under the govt's reading b/c you're "obtaining" words & pictures from your Instagram feed. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Eric Geller @ericgeller

Gorsuch: If the CFAA doesn't cover these kinds of things, but there are other, more troublesome activities, like what you client did, are there other laws that could cover those offenses? Fisher: Yes. Every offense that the government wants covered is covered by another law. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2020 Hibernated

© 2026 Politiwatch. Tweets and other media belong to their indicated owners; all other materials are licensed CC-BY-SA. If you use PolitiTweet professionally, please feel free to let us know. Note that PolitiTweet stopped archiving new tweets on April 3, 2023, when Twitter disabled our API access.