Nassim Nicholas Taleb @nntaleb
Peer review is often necessary but v. highly insufficient; gives cover to unrigorous crap. There are citation rings. Imagine passing a review on risk by an ignorant psych like @PTetlock who still doesn't know the difference betw probability & expectation or point estimate & EVT. — PolitiTweet.org
Nassim Nicholas Taleb @nntaleb
@trishankkarthik @stephen_wolfram I use peer review but find it insufficient