Natasha Bertrand

@NatashaBertrand ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 13, 2020

Created

Fri Nov 29 16:37:36 +0000 2019

Likes

192

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Natasha Bertrand @NatashaBertrand

@InSpiteOfTrump Definitely complicated, but the theory is that the “no quid pro quo” call Sondland testified to actually took place on Sept 7, and it was “no quid pro quo” with a key caveat that Sondland left out but others testified to—a demand that Zelensky personally announce investigations. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 29, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Natasha Bertrand @NatashaBertrand

Important analysis: “The ‘no quid pro quo’ call was, in reality, a ‘here is the specific quid pro quo I want’ call. And, by erroneously placing the call on September 9th, Sondland helped obscure these omissions from his testimony, by divorcing the call from its actual context.” — PolitiTweet.org

We weren't planning to publish today at Just Security. But this is an important and timely piece. VERY solid proof… https://t.co/Gak5c2cDjB

Posted Nov. 29, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Natasha Bertrand @NatashaBertrand

@joeamon @Mimirocah1 @JoyceWhiteVance @mayawiley @michelleinbklyn @JillWineBanks @woodruffbets @neal_katyal @harrylitman @mehdirhasan @matthewamiller @cornellbelcher Thank you 🙏 🙏 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 29, 2019 Hibernated