Natasha Bertrand @NatashaBertrand
Important analysis: “The ‘no quid pro quo’ call was, in reality, a ‘here is the specific quid pro quo I want’ call. And, by erroneously placing the call on September 9th, Sondland helped obscure these omissions from his testimony, by divorcing the call from its actual context.” — PolitiTweet.org
Ryan Goodman @rgoodlaw
We weren't planning to publish today at Just Security. But this is an important and timely piece. VERY solid proof… https://t.co/Gak5c2cDjB
