Cernovich

@Cernovich ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 6, 2020

Created

Thu May 14 00:15:00 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Cernovich @Cernovich

@BruceGodfrey Yes because judgment isn't final until sentencing has been issued. Hence case was still within full discretion of prosecutor. Had sentence been issued, DOJ couldn't have dismissed case. They could have neglected to oppose an appeal, but CTA could appoint amicus. Inapplicable now. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 14, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Cernovich @Cernovich

A lot of very smart lawyers and law professors are playing dumb re: Judge Sullivan and Flynn. You can hate Trump and feel mad at Flynn. The law is clear. Sullivan has no discretion at all. He *must* dismiss the case. See also, U.S. v. Fokker Serv. (DC Cir 2016). https://t.co/9N3oj9wAFW — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 14, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Cernovich @Cernovich

RT @TurtleboyTweets: Aidan will be interviewing Marc Randazza tonight at 9/ET. He's the "Clarence Darrow of the Free Speech Movement" accor… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 14, 2020 Retweet Hibernated