nilay patel

@reckless ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked May 20, 2022

Created

Mon May 09 23:22:48 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

nilay patel @reckless

@BrandonLive @marypcbuk Now shepardize this 40-year-old case and see where the boundaries have moved, heh. Also the core holding here is that commercial speech is protected and can only be banned in narrow ways — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Preceded By

nilay patel @reckless

@BrandonLive @marypcbuk I don’t know, I would have to read the case law to figure out the boundaries in 2022. “False advertising” means a lot of things to a lot of people, mere “puffery” is protected speech. The hairs, splitting endlessly — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Followed By

nilay patel @reckless

Engineers thinking the legal system works like computers will be the death of us all — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022